Can Trump Sue Jerome Powell? Legal Reality and Interest-Rate Impacts
By Jarod Clark
Published: August 13, 2025
TL;DR
President Trump said he’s considering allowing a “major lawsuit” against Fed Chair Jerome Powell, citing cost overruns on the Federal Reserve’s headquarters renovation and frustration with the pace of rate cuts. Legal experts say such a suit would almost certainly go nowhere because of sovereign and qualified immunity and because policy “performance” isn’t a justiciable claim. Markets still expect the Fed to cut rates in September based on the data, not politics, though headline risk can cause short-term volatility. Reuters+1Barron's
What actually happened
On August 12, 2025, the White House said the President is considering a lawsuit against Powell tied to the multibillion-dollar renovation of the Fed’s Washington headquarters—an issue Trump has used to criticize Powell while pressing for faster rate cuts. Renovation estimates have climbed from roughly $1.9B to around $2.4–$2.5B, according to multiple reports. ReutersBarron's
The Fed notes the project was approved in 2017 by its Board of Governors (not Congress) and is overseen and budgeted annually by the Board. Because the Fed self-funds operations, its facilities aren’t financed through annual congressional appropriations. Federal ReserveKansas City Federal ReserveCongress.gov
Is Powell “entitled to qualified immunity”?
In practical terms, yes—for damages claims against him personally arising from official acts:
-
Sovereign immunity generally bars suits seeking money damages against the United States and its agencies unless Congress clearly waives immunity. Suing Powell “in his official capacity” is typically just another way of suing the government, so sovereign immunity applies. Congress.gov
-
Westfall Act: For common-law torts based on acts within a federal employee’s official duties, the United States is substituted as the defendant and the case proceeds, if at all, under the Federal Tort Claims Act (again triggering sovereign immunity limits). Legal Information InstituteDepartment of Justice
-
Qualified immunity: For personal-capacity constitutional claims, federal officials are shielded from damages unless they violated “clearly established” law—an extraordinarily high bar, especially for discretionary policy decisions like monetary policy or facility management oversight. Legal Information Institute+1
Bottom line: a “lawsuit over performance” has no obvious legal hook and would be quickly challenged on jurisdictional and immunity grounds. MarketWatch
Could the President fire Powell instead?
Statute provides that Board members (including the Chair as a Governor) serve 14-year terms and may be removed by the President for cause. The Chair’s designation as chair runs four years (Powell’s ends May 2026). Courts have treated the Fed as an independent agency with removal protections for its Governors; recent threats to fire Powell have already drawn warnings about market stability and Fed independence. Any removal attempt would almost certainly invite litigation. Federal ReserveLegal Information InstituteReuters
Likely legal outcomes (and how each could affect rates)
-
No suit is filed (most likely).
Rhetoric fades; Fed tracks the data. Market odds of a September rate cut remain high given softer inflation and labor data. Expect limited rate volatility tied to headlines. Reuters -
Suit is filed and dismissed quickly.
Courts dispose of it on sovereign/qualified immunity or lack of a legal claim. Policy path is unchanged; any knee-jerk move in yields reverses as the legal risk clears. Legal Information Institute+1 -
Broader political campaign against the Fed (hearings, IG/GAO probes).
Even without a viable lawsuit, oversight actions can add headline risk and nudge term premia (long-bond yields) higher temporarily, but the direction of policy still hinges on incoming inflation and jobs data. Congress.gov -
Attempt to remove Powell “for cause.”
This would trigger immediate court challenges and likely spark a sharper, risk-off market reaction as investors reassess Fed independence—typically pushing long yields and the dollar around and widening credit spreads. Rate cuts could still occur if the data warrant, but the path might be bumpier. Reuters
What this means for borrowers and savers
-
Mortgage, auto, and personal loan rates: If the Fed cuts in September as markets currently expect, average consumer borrowing costs should edge down, though lenders may keep a cushion if political noise lifts risk premia. Reuters
-
Savings yields: High-yield savings and CDs may drift lower after cuts, but banks often move more slowly on deposit rates than on loan rates.
Use our calculators to model scenarios—for example, test a 0.25% or 0.50% rate drop to see how monthly payments and total interest change on your loan.
FAQ
Wouldn’t a lawsuit just waste government resources?
If a case were filed, the government (through DOJ) would move to dismiss quickly, minimizing but not eliminating costs. The bigger “cost” is policy uncertainty and headline risk, not courtroom outcomes. MarketWatch
Who pays for the Fed’s buildings?
The Fed self-funds operations and capital projects from its own income; it is not funded through annual congressional appropriations, though it reports to Congress. Kansas City Federal ReserveCongress.gov
Sources & further reading
-
Reuters: Trump weighing lawsuit against Powell over renovations; markets’ September-cut odds. Reuters+1
-
Barron’s / MarketWatch: Threat details and why a suit is unlikely to succeed. Barron'sMarketWatch
-
Fed & law references: Fed building FAQ; Section 10 (12 U.S.C. § 242); sovereign & qualified immunity and the Westfall Act. Federal Reserve+1Congress.govLegal Information Institute+1